I picked up a 50ct. box of a hundred and sixty Nosler Accubonds, but I'm hesitant to burn off the powder and projectiles on workup when all I've is 50 bullets. But I really need to locate a bullet from the a hundred and sixty course that my older rifle likes.
H4831SC Powder accessible in stock now. Ballistically, this Serious Extruded powder is the exact duplicate of H4831. Bodily, it's got a shorter grain size, therefore, the designation SC or shorter Lower. The shorter, extra compact kernels enable the powder to move from the powder actions more easily, assisting to ease the continuous reducing of granules.
It is most likely that no further dialogue is necessary, where situation we suggest starting a completely new thread. If on the other hand you really feel your response is required you may nevertheless do so.
Operate your load up with the specific powder (sc or standard) and ton you're working with although. Similar burn fee does not imply it will eventually behave "specifically" a similar. I've witnessed over 100 fps difference between sc and mil-surp plenty of H4831.
The only variance as I realize it would be that the SC was intended to operate by way of powder actions much better (which it does). The extended grains will not feed very well in the least in a few measures. Thats my 02 :grin:
Liberalism; The unachievable yet accepted notion that it is completely achievable to choose up a turd because of the thoroughly clean conclude.
I am working with it which has a 210 Berger. In my rifle, H1000 wasn't as precise. RL22 did very well but I used to be somewhat worried about temp steadiness. I feel I'm at 72 grains and get all-around 2850ish fps
Although this might be accurate, there is a whole lot far more to it than just not blowing you up. He could not hit prairie dogs further than about one hundred fifty yards, so I am guessing that inconsistent combustion wasn't performing anything favorable for his grouping skill with People loads.
At the moment making use of IMR 4831 in a 300WSM, and see the H4831sc is a well-liked option for this caliber and yields a bit more velocity. Apart from it becoming short Slash, exactly what is the primary difference in these two powders, and should I swap to H4831sc?
Why would I mention this? Precisely what is my stage? I'm undecided that there's a true valid stage other than what's well-liked with most hasn't been well known with me in the least in these situation. Do I just Have a very powder jinx or some thing? In order to tell you h4831sc about how ridiculous I really am, tomorrow I am array screening a buddies new .
This is an older thread, you may not receive a reaction, and will be reviving an aged thread. Please take into account developing a new thread.
This is often an Intense extruded propellant and delivers heightened insensitivity to cold and warm temperatures.
I realize the H4831SC provides a greater load density But I think I've ample area in my case for the traditional H4831.
I could stack em in one gap but I wasn’t satisfied with the velocity. Just after months, I acquired lucky and caught some H1000 h4831 vs h4831sc on line and naturally compensated somewhat additional. The pretty following week at a gun show a guy experienced a whole scenario of H1000 for $40 for each 1lb. I forget the amount, but h4831 vs h4831sc Using the H1000 I’m now pushing a 160gr about 3200 and it’s a moderate load.